As
we begin to assess the candidates for the first Saturday in May, it is
important to point out that it is much too early to make decisions on
who will be the final contenders. However, my analysis has shown
that all of the winners of the Derby since 2000 have had median energy
distributions of less than 68% and final 3f times in their last race
before the Derby of less than 38 seconds. In effect, the energy
distribution number indicates as to whether a horse wants to go beyond
9 furlongs to the classic distance of a mile and a quarter (10
furlongs) in the Derby. I want to see an energy distirbution of
less than 68% at 9f, a final 3f time of less than 38 seconds, and a
competitive final time. (See my analysis of Kentucky Derby 2002
for more information on how I reach my conclusions).
The following is a table of past Derby winners' race before the Derby:
Yr |
Name |
Derby Winning Beyer |
Last Race
Final 3f time |
Last Race
%ME |
ESP |
2000 |
Fusaichi Pegasus |
108 |
37.0 |
67.60% |
SP |
2001 |
Monarchos |
116 |
37.3 |
67.79% |
SP |
2002 |
War Emblem |
114 |
36.7 |
66.75% |
S |
2003 |
Funny Cide |
109 |
37.5 |
67.82% |
SP |
2004 |
Smarty Jones |
107 |
37.8 |
67.69% |
SP |
2005 |
Giacomo |
100 |
37.6 |
67.55% |
S |
Note that all
have met the criteria for the energy distribution and the last 3f time.
All have either a S or SP running style meaning that they are
either a sustained presser in the second half of the group or a dead
closer based on time distribution. War Emblem, for example, liked
to run on the lead, but his times also showed that he ran fast at the
end of the race.
There is one anomaly that deserves mention. Last year, the two
best horses coming into the Derby were Bellamy Road and Afleet Alex,
with both posting much higher Beyers in preceding races than
Giacomo's winning effort in the Derby. Bellamy Road was hurt, and
Afleet Alex didn't run his race for whatever reason. Therefore,
Giacomo came in with a slower final time and accompanying Beyer.
His final time before the Derby was not special at all. In
truth, he lugged up to win the Derby.
This year, I will follow the contenders as defined by the Kentucky
Derby Future Wager pools starting with the Number 2 pool as of March 2,
2006. I will try to separate the contenders based on their final
3f times and energy distribution numbers with no consideration of final
time. Any horse can be added or subtracted, but no horses will be
added unless they show that they can run the 3f time under 38 seconds
and have an energy distribution under 68%. Horses that have run
less than 9f but show a good energy distribution number will be put in
a second tier. There will be question mark horses as well.
More
|